<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Louisville Homes Blog: #1 Real Estate Blog in Louisville, KY &#187; Trends/Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/category/trends-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com</link>
	<description>The #1 Real Estate Blog in Louisville Kentucky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Louisville #4 Most Affordable City to Buy a Home</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/louisville-4-most-affordable-city-to-buy-a-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/louisville-4-most-affordable-city-to-buy-a-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Residential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francesca Levy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Houses like this great ranch home in Douglass Hills are quite affordable when compared with the nation as a whole. The Forbes.com Web site confuses me. I know they&#8217;re trying to have more pages, so each page can have more ads, thus more ad revenue, but as far as navigating it, I always find it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/07/douglass_hills.jpg" alt="Home in Douglass Hills" /></div>
<div class="caption">Houses like this great ranch home in <a href="http://www.trepryor.com/louisville/douglass_hills/" target="_blank">Douglass Hills</a> are quite affordable when compared with the nation as a whole.</div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.forbes.com" target="_blank">Forbes.com</a> Web site confuses me. I know they&#8217;re trying to have more pages, so each page can have more ads, thus more ad revenue, but as far as navigating it, I always find it frustrating.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s not frustrating is that Forbes&#8217; analysts are high on Louisville real estate. So much so that again this year they rank our fair city quite high&#8212;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/23/most-affordable-cities-homes-lifestyle-real-estate-housing_slide_8.html" target="_blank">4th in the country</a>, in fact. Just last November, Francesca Levy had Louisville at #17 in her Best Bang-For-The-Buck Cities, which I posted <a href="http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2009/12/louisville-24-in-bang-for-the-buck-rankings/">here</a>. So now, just over half a year later, she&#8217;s moved us up 13 spots.</p>
<ol>
<li>Pittsburgh, Pa.</li>
<li>Indianapolis, Ind.</li>
<li>Chattanooga, Tenn.</li>
<li><strong>Louisville, Ky.</strong></li>
<li>Oklahoma City, Okla.</li>
<li>Syracuse, N.Y.</li>
<li>Rochester, N.Y.</li>
<li>Columbia, S.C.</li>
<li>Dayton, Ohio</li>
<li>Cincinnati, Ohio</li>
</ol>
<p>Feel free to read the entire piece, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/23/most-affordable-cities-homes-lifestyle-real-estate-housing.html" target="_blank">Most Affordable Places to Buy a Home</a>, where you&#8217;ll find this paragraph highlighting Louisville.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the Midwest, neighboring Indiana and Kentucky both boast metros high on the list: Indianapolis, Ind., came in second place, and Louisville, Ky., placed fourth. Homeowners in both cities spend around 20% of their income on the monthly costs of ownership. That&#8217;s an added perk to the already low cost of housing&#8211;in Indianapolis, 95% of residents can afford a median-priced home, more than anywhere else in the country.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/louisville-4-most-affordable-city-to-buy-a-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Home Improvement Dollars Are Spent</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/how-home-improvement-dollars-are-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/how-home-improvement-dollars-are-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See how home improvement dollars are being spent on different parts of the home. (Click to enlarge.) The fine folks at Fixr have updated their Home Improvement graphic with new numbers. I believe it&#8217;s interesting to see how the highs of 2007 have been dropping even as home sales have dropped at the same time. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="yeslink"><a href="http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/pics/2010/07/us-home-improvement-industry-at-a-glance.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="/pics/2010/07/us-home-improvement-industry-at-a-glance_sm.jpg" alt="Chart: US Home Improvement Industry, At a Glance" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">See how home improvement dollars are being spent on different parts of the home. (Click to enlarge.)</div>
<p>The fine folks at Fixr have updated their <a href="http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/home-money-is-spent-on-diy-home-improvement/">Home Improvement graphic</a> with new numbers. I believe it&#8217;s interesting to see how the highs of 2007 have been dropping even as home sales have dropped at the same time. This says that most consumers aren&#8217;t very optimistic about the direction of our economy.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Louisville home owner, feel free to click on our <a href="http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/category/home-improvement/">Home Improvement</a> category for all the posts related to improving your Louisville home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/07/how-home-improvement-dollars-are-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metro Louisville Home Sales Market Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/metro-louisville-home-sales-market-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/metro-louisville-home-sales-market-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville Home Sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 trending over past two years but short of 2006-07 levels. We began this feature on Louisville Homes Blog back in April and will be updating this chart periodically. Putting this data into chart form makes it easier to discern trends against past performance. Enjoy! This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/pics/2010/06/home_sales_chart.gif" alt="Louisville Home Sales Chart: 2006-2010" /></p>
<div class="caption">2010 trending over past two years but short of 2006-07 levels.</div>
<p>We began this feature on Louisville Homes Blog back in April and will be updating this chart periodically. Putting this data into chart form makes it easier to discern trends against past performance. Enjoy!</p>
<p><a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/3.0/us/80x15.png" /></a><br />This <span xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage" rel="dc:type">work</span> is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/metro-louisville-home-sales-market-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate Tops Stock Market in Investment Duel</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/real-estate-tops-stock-market-in-investment-duel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/real-estate-tops-stock-market-in-investment-duel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASDAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P 500]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought I&#8217;d share what a friend sent to me today. Not sure if this holds to public perception or not but even with &#8220;the worst housing market in decades&#8221; the numbers tell a different story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d share what a friend sent to me today. Not sure if this holds to public perception or not but even with &#8220;the worst housing market in decades&#8221; the numbers tell a different story. </p>
<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/06/investments.gif" alt="Chart of various Returns on Investments" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/real-estate-tops-stock-market-in-investment-duel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Louisvillians Are Moving</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/where-louisvillians-are-moving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/where-louisvillians-are-moving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Census Bureau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually, I&#8217;m all about charts, maps, graphs&#8230; you get the picture. When I read the excerpt from a Web site I visit regularly, I was excited to try it out for my hometown of Louisville, KY. Trouble is, this might be one of those few times where the picture doesn&#8217;t communicate the information very well. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="yeslink"><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/04/migration-moving-wealthy-interactive-counties-map.html" target="_blank"><img src="/pics/2010/06/moving_to_from_louisville.gif" alt="Map: Where Americans Are Moving: Jefferson County" /></a></div>
<p>Usually, I&#8217;m all about charts, maps, graphs&#8230; you get the picture. When I read the excerpt from a Web site I visit regularly, I was excited to try it out for my hometown of Louisville, KY. </p>
<p>Trouble is, this might be one of those few times where the picture doesn&#8217;t communicate the information very well. Maybe another kind of chart would work better?</p>
<p>All I can tell is that it appears that more people are moving out of Louisville than are moving in. This agrees with <a href="http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFPopulation?_event=Search&#038;geo_id=01000US&#038;_geoContext=&#038;_street=&#038;_county=louisville&#038;_cityTown=louisville&#038;_state=04000US21&#038;_zip=&#038;_lang=en&#038;_sse=on&#038;ActiveGeoDiv=geoSelect&#038;_useEV=&#038;pctxt=fph&#038;pgsl=010&#038;_submenuId=population_0&#038;ds_name=null&#038;_ci_nbr=null&#038;qr_name=null&#038;reg=null%3Anull&#038;_keyword=&#038;_industry="  target="_blank">census data</a> that says we&#8217;ve lost 13,000 people since 1990. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/06/where-louisvillians-are-moving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry Still Winning the Mobile Phone War, But for How Long?</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/blackberry-still-winning-the-mobile-phone-war-but-for-how-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/blackberry-still-winning-the-mobile-phone-war-but-for-how-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyTouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw recently that the National Association of Realtors published their annual Smartphone Survey Report. A great deal of this report is already well-known (and boring) but a couple of the results caught my eye. Keep in mind this survey is targeting real estate agents not the public at large. When I became a Realtor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw recently that the <a href="http://www.realtor.org" target="_blank">National Association of Realtors</a> published their annual <a href="http://www.realtor.org/wps/wcm/connect/c03d6e0041a0ba009215ffa3819af93a/smartphonesurveyreport.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&#038;CACHEID=c03d6e0041a0ba009215ffa3819af93a" target="_blank">Smartphone Survey Report</a>. A great deal of this report is already well-known (and boring) but a couple of the results caught my eye. Keep in mind this survey is targeting real estate agents not the public at large.</p>
<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/05/smartphone_os.jpg" alt="Smartphone OS for Real Estate Agents" /></div>
<p>When I became a <a href="http://www.trepryor.com/" target="_blank">Realtor in Louisville</a>, I had a standard cell phone but I knew I needed a more powerful communication tool. So I performed some research and eventually purchased a <a href="http://www.blackberry.com/" target="_blank">BlackBerry</a>. </p>
<p>This new device was certainly better than my <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/mobile/mobile-phones/index.idx?pagetype=type" target="_blank">Samsung</a> but it wasn&#8217;t incredible. Email was much better, texting was good, but surfing the Web was horrible. It would also crash unpredictably to which tech support gave me the &#8220;reboot the phone and try again&#8221; routine. Personally, I wondered what all the hype was about. Looking at this survey, it seems a lot of real estate agents have followed this path.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to see next year&#8217;s survey and how much <a href="http://www.android.com/" target="_blank">Android</a> increases. I predict it takes major market share away from BlackBerry with the iPhone inching up as well.</p>
<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/05/smartphone_brand.jpg" alt="Smartphone Brand for Real Estate Agents" /></div>
<p>The Smartphone brand holds closely to the OS as you would expect. The phone I own now is a <a href="http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/" target="_blank">MyTouch</a> from T-Mobile. This phone so much better than my BlackBerry it&#8217;s hardly worth discussing. From texting, Web surfing, contact management, calendar integration with Google, and the ability to add new, useful applications, I find it hard to understand why anyone would continue with a BlackBerry. I&#8217;m really impressed with my <a href="http://www.htc.com" target="_blank">HTC</a> product. </p>
<p>Here are some of the other items of note from the survey. Email remains the top reason for a real estate agent acquiring a smartphone. In fact, email (88.4%) is only slightly behind making a phone call (91.2%) in most used feature. The most used downloadable applications are for social media, with <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> being the most likely winner in that war. </p>
<p>83.5% of all respondents are either Satisfied or Extremely Satisfied with their smartphone with iPhone owners leading the way in this category. </p>
<p>For the record, the saddest result in the survey is that 17.5% have no interest in getting a smartphone despite the high level of satisfaction among smartphone owners. Just goes to show that new technology is not for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/blackberry-still-winning-the-mobile-phone-war-but-for-how-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisville Home Prices Drop/Increase Depending on Methodology</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/louisville-home-prices-dropincrease-depending-on-methodology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/louisville-home-prices-dropincrease-depending-on-methodology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind that these numbers are affected by distressed transactions which are a good portion of our sales and currently increasing. Stats and projections provided by CoreLogic. In Louisville-Jefferson County, home prices, including distressed sales, declined by -0.73 percent in March 2010 compared to March 2009. This compares to February&#8217;s year-over-year HPI, which was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that these numbers are affected by distressed transactions which are a good portion of our sales and currently increasing. Stats and projections provided by <a href="http://www.corelogic.com/">CoreLogic</a>. </p>
<blockquote><p>In Louisville-Jefferson County, home prices, including distressed sales, <strong>declined by -0.73</strong> percent in March 2010 compared to March 2009. This compares to February&#8217;s year-over-year HPI, which was 0.87 percent.** Excluding distressed transactions, year-over-year HPI for March is <strong>1.87 percent</strong> [editor: that's an increase], compared to February which was 0.37 percent.</p>
<p>CoreLogic is projecting the 12-month forecast for Louisville-Jefferson County home prices, including distressed sales, will be 1.63 percent.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/05/louisville-home-prices-dropincrease-depending-on-methodology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisville Homes Sold by Year</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-homes-sold-by-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-homes-sold-by-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Turgenev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting data into chart form almost always communicates better than simply reading the data. For example, looking at the chart above that shows the total number of homes sold by year in Louisville, KY. It&#8217;s clear that 2008 and 2009 have been tremendously down years, when compared to the previous five. But look back to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/04/sold_homes_by_year.gif" alt="Number of Homes Sold by Year" /></div>
<p>Putting data into chart form almost always communicates better than simply reading the data. For example, looking at the chart above that shows the total number of homes sold by year in Louisville, KY. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that 2008 and 2009 have been tremendously down years, when compared to the previous five. But look back to the levels of the late 90&#8242;s and early 00&#8242;s and they are right in line. Interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Turgenev" target="_blank">Ivan Turgenev</a> would have been proud. He originally authored, &#8220;A picture shows me at a glance what it takes dozens of pages of a book to expound.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-homes-sold-by-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Average Finally Positive, Kentucky Beats Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/national-average-finally-positive-kentucky-beats-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/national-average-finally-positive-kentucky-beats-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First American CoreLogic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First American CoreLogic produces some great reports. Not great in the sense that everything is positive but that they are very thorough and timely. This most recent report has this to say about real estate in Louisville, Kentucky. In Louisville-Jefferson County, home prices, including distressed sales, increased by 0.87 percent in February 2010 compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.facorelogic.com/" target="_blank">First American CoreLogic</a> produces some great reports. Not great in the sense that everything is positive but that they are very thorough and timely. This most recent report has this to say about real estate in Louisville, Kentucky.</p>
<blockquote><p>In <strong>Louisville-Jefferson County</strong>, home prices, including distressed sales, <strong>increased by 0.87 percent</strong> in February 2010 compared to February 2009. This compares to January&#8217;s year-over-year HPI, which was -0.10 percent.** Excluding distressed transactions, year-over-year HPI for February is 0.37 percent, compared to January which was 0.92 percent.</p>
<p>First American CoreLogic is projecting the 12-month forecast for Louisville-Jefferson County home prices, including distressed sales, will be 1.66 percent.</p></blockquote>
<p>The housing market increased 0.87 compared to the national average of 0.30. The 12-month forecast for all of Kentucky is 0.9% compared to a prediction of -3.4% for the nation. So you can see that <a href="http://www.TrePryor.com/">Louisville real estate</a> is, at this point, outperforming the country. </p>
<p>Below is the entire chart if you&#8217;d like to see each state&#8217;s performance and forecast. More can also be found in their white paper titled, <a href="http://www.loanperformance.com/infocenter/whitepaper/Tax_Credit_White_Paper_final_0410.pdf" target="_blank">Measuring the Effect of the Housing Stimulus Programs on Future House Prices (PDF)</a>.</p>
<h3>February HPI State and National Ranking:</h3>
<table border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2">State</th>
<th colspan="2">February 2010 12 Month HPI<br />
Change by State</th>
<th colspan="2">12 Month Forecast<br />
(February 2010 &#8211; February 2011)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Single Family Combined</th>
<th>Single Family Combined Excluding Distressed</th>
<th>Single Family Combined</th>
<th>Single Family Combined Excluding Distressed</th>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>National</td>
<td align="right">0.3%</td>
<td align="right">0.6%</td>
<td align="right">-3.4%</td>
<td align="right">4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Idaho</td>
<td align="right">-13.7%</td>
<td align="right">-5.2%</td>
<td align="right">-2.2%</td>
<td align="right">7.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Nevada</td>
<td align="right">-12.9%</td>
<td align="right">-12.0%</td>
<td align="right">2.4%</td>
<td align="right">1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Florida</td>
<td align="right">-8.5%</td>
<td align="right">-7.6%</td>
<td align="right">-1.6%</td>
<td align="right">2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Illinois</td>
<td align="right">-8.3%</td>
<td align="right">-4.8%</td>
<td align="right">-2.8%</td>
<td align="right">4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Oregon</td>
<td align="right">-7.7%</td>
<td align="right">-4.8%</td>
<td align="right">-3.2%</td>
<td align="right">-0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Alabama</td>
<td align="right">-7.7%</td>
<td align="right">-4.0%</td>
<td align="right">-0.6%</td>
<td align="right">3.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Maryland</td>
<td align="right">-7.5%</td>
<td align="right">-3.2%</td>
<td align="right">-1.5%</td>
<td align="right">5.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Arizona</td>
<td align="right">-6.7%</td>
<td align="right">-7.1%</td>
<td align="right">2.0%</td>
<td align="right">4.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Wyoming</td>
<td align="right">-6.7%</td>
<td align="right">-4.7%</td>
<td align="right">-2.5%</td>
<td align="right">0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Utah</td>
<td align="right">-6.3%</td>
<td align="right">-5.8%</td>
<td align="right">-1.3%</td>
<td align="right">1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Washington</td>
<td align="right">-5.9%</td>
<td align="right">-4.4%</td>
<td align="right">-4.8%</td>
<td align="right">-0.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Michigan</td>
<td align="right">-4.7%</td>
<td align="right">-9.1%</td>
<td align="right">-9.7%</td>
<td align="right">-9.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Kansas</td>
<td align="right">-4.4%</td>
<td align="right">-3.1%</td>
<td align="right">-3.6%</td>
<td align="right">2.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>New Jersey</td>
<td align="right">-3.7%</td>
<td align="right">-2.3%</td>
<td align="right">0.7%</td>
<td align="right">5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>West Virginia</td>
<td align="right">-3.5%</td>
<td align="right">-2.2%</td>
<td align="right">-1.0%</td>
<td align="right">2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Tennessee</td>
<td align="right">-3.4%</td>
<td align="right">-1.7%</td>
<td align="right">-2.3%</td>
<td align="right">2.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Pennsylvania</td>
<td align="right">-3.1%</td>
<td align="right">-1.5%</td>
<td align="right">-1.3%</td>
<td align="right">2.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Georgia</td>
<td align="right">-2.9%</td>
<td align="right">-1.2%</td>
<td align="right">-3.7%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Mississippi</td>
<td align="right">-2.9%</td>
<td align="right">0.2%</td>
<td align="right">-0.6%</td>
<td align="right">2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>North Carolina</td>
<td align="right">-2.3%</td>
<td align="right">-2.2%</td>
<td align="right">-1.2%</td>
<td align="right">0.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Alaska</td>
<td align="right">-2.3%</td>
<td align="right">-1.8%</td>
<td align="right">-1.2%</td>
<td align="right">5.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Louisiana</td>
<td align="right">-1.8%</td>
<td align="right">0.8%</td>
<td align="right">0.6%</td>
<td align="right">3.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td align="right">-1.8%</td>
<td align="right">-1.8%</td>
<td align="right">-1.1%</td>
<td align="right">2.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>New Mexico</td>
<td align="right">-1.5%</td>
<td align="right">0.0%</td>
<td align="right">-1.0%</td>
<td align="right">6.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Montana</td>
<td align="right">-1.4%</td>
<td align="right">-0.8%</td>
<td align="right">0.3%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Rhode Island</td>
<td align="right">-1.4%</td>
<td align="right">-4.8%</td>
<td align="right">7.4%</td>
<td align="right">3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Missouri</td>
<td align="right">-1.1%</td>
<td align="right">-0.2%</td>
<td align="right">-2.5%</td>
<td align="right">2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Oklahoma</td>
<td align="right">-1.1%</td>
<td align="right">-2.2%</td>
<td align="right">-0.4%</td>
<td align="right">-0.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>South Carolina</td>
<td align="right">-1.0%</td>
<td align="right">0.0%</td>
<td align="right">0.1%</td>
<td align="right">3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Delaware</td>
<td align="right">-0.8%</td>
<td align="right">1.7%</td>
<td align="right">-0.1%</td>
<td align="right">4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Connecticut</td>
<td align="right">-0.5%</td>
<td align="right">-1.1%</td>
<td align="right">-1.3%</td>
<td align="right">4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Indiana</td>
<td align="right">-0.3%</td>
<td align="right">-0.9%</td>
<td align="right">-2.5%</td>
<td align="right">2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>New York</td>
<td align="right">-0.3%</td>
<td align="right">1.8%</td>
<td align="right">0.5%</td>
<td align="right">5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>South Dakota</td>
<td align="right">-0.2%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
<td align="right">0.7%</td>
<td align="right">4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Minnesota</td>
<td align="right">0.1%</td>
<td align="right">-1.9%</td>
<td align="right">-2.0%</td>
<td align="right">1.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Iowa</td>
<td align="right">0.6%</td>
<td align="right">-0.1%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
<td align="right">3.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Arkansas</td>
<td align="right">0.9%</td>
<td align="right">1.0%</td>
<td align="right">1.7%</td>
<td align="right">1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Texas</td>
<td align="right">1.7%</td>
<td align="right">0.2%</td>
<td align="right">1.1%</td>
<td align="right">1.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Ohio</td>
<td align="right">2.5%</td>
<td align="right">0.0%</td>
<td align="right">-1.1%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>New Hampshire</td>
<td align="right">2.5%</td>
<td align="right">0.5%</td>
<td align="right">0.7%</td>
<td align="right">3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>District of Columbia</td>
<td align="right">2.5%</td>
<td align="right">5.4%</td>
<td align="right">-0.8%</td>
<td align="right">5.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle" style="background-color: #C0BFBB;">
<td>Kentucky</td>
<td align="right">2.5%</td>
<td align="right">2.0%</td>
<td align="right">0.9%</td>
<td align="right">3.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>California</td>
<td align="right">2.8%</td>
<td align="right">4.6%</td>
<td align="right">-1.8%</td>
<td align="right">8.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Nebraska</td>
<td align="right">2.8%</td>
<td align="right">1.9%</td>
<td align="right">0.6%</td>
<td align="right">4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Hawaii</td>
<td align="right">3.4%</td>
<td align="right">7.6%</td>
<td align="right">-1.3%</td>
<td align="right">5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Colorado</td>
<td align="right">4.6%</td>
<td align="right">4.1%</td>
<td align="right">3.8%</td>
<td align="right">8.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Massachusetts</td>
<td align="right">5.6%</td>
<td align="right">2.9%</td>
<td align="right">6.0%</td>
<td align="right">6.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Virginia</td>
<td align="right">6.2%</td>
<td align="right">3.7%</td>
<td align="right">7.4%</td>
<td align="right">10.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Vermont</td>
<td align="right">8.7%</td>
<td align="right">3.3%</td>
<td align="right">3.2%</td>
<td align="right">5.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>North Dakota</td>
<td align="right">9.0%</td>
<td align="right">8.6%</td>
<td align="right">6.7%</td>
<td align="right">7.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr align="left" valign="middle">
<td>Maine</td>
<td align="right">11.9%</td>
<td align="right">4.4%</td>
<td align="right">3.7%</td>
<td align="right">7.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><small>Source: First American CoreLogic, LoanPerformance HPI as of February 2010. </small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/national-average-finally-positive-kentucky-beats-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisville Home Sales Up, Home Prices Down</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-home-sales-up-home-prices-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-home-sales-up-home-prices-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tre Pryor, Editor-in-Chief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiserv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAVE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/?p=1184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a couple pieces of news that relate to Louisville real estate. The first comes from an AP story that WAVE picked up, Pending home sales rise 8.2 percent in February. The National Association of Realtors said Monday its seasonally adjusted index of sales agreements rose 8.2 percent from January to a February reading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple pieces of news that relate to <a href="http://www.trepryor.com/">Louisville real estate</a>. The first comes from an AP story that WAVE picked up, <a href="http://www.wave3.com/Global/story.asp?S=12256779" target="_blank">Pending home sales rise 8.2 percent in February</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The National Association of Realtors said Monday its seasonally adjusted index of sales agreements rose 8.2 percent from January to a February reading of 97.6. January&#8217;s reading was revised slightly downward to 90.2.</p></blockquote>
<p>A lot of this is due to the tax incentives that are due to expire on April 30, 2010, but still it&#8217;s positive news. What will be more telling is the numbers for May and how they compare to the last two years.</p>
<p>This second piece of news isn&#8217;t as bright in regards to home prices in Louisville. According to <a href="http://investors.fiserv.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=457516" title="For Many U.S. Markets, the Return to Peak Home Prices Will Be a Long, Slow Road" target="_blank">this report by Fiserv</a>, Louisville home prices dropped -2.3%. The more interesting prediction is that they believe that prices will continue to drop in Louisville until the 4th Quarter of 2010 but will return to previous levels by the 4th Quarter of 2012. See the image below to see how Louisville compares to other Metro areas.</p>
<div class="nolink"><img src="/pics/2010/04/fiserv_home_price_data.gif" alt="Detailed home price data for Metro Areas in the U.S. including Louisville, KY." /></div>
<p>As you can see, <em>Louisville&#8217;s housing market is outperforming every city on this list</em>. That&#8217;s impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.louisvillehomesblog.com/2010/04/louisville-home-sales-up-home-prices-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
